Slow Cooker Pinto Beans w/ Smoked Ham Hocks

Slow Cooker Pinto Beans w/ Smoked Ham Hocks

4.4 of 5 (9)
member ratings
Create a Recipe Makeover
Nutritional Info
  • Servings Per Recipe: 10
  • Amount Per Serving
  • Calories: 215.8
  • Total Fat: 9.4 g
  • Cholesterol: 21.0 mg
  • Sodium: 632.0 mg
  • Total Carbs: 21.5 g
  • Dietary Fiber: 6.5 g
  • Protein: 11.9 g

View full nutritional breakdown of Slow Cooker Pinto Beans w/ Smoked Ham Hocks calories by ingredient
Submitted by:

Introduction

Yummy beans with bits of smoked ham. Yummy beans with bits of smoked ham.
Number of Servings: 10

Ingredients

    -4 C. dry pinto beans
    -1.25lb or 2 smoked ham hocks
    -1 medium onion diced
    -1.75 C. diced celery
    -1 to 2 cloves minced garlic
    -8 C. water
    Optional:
    -ground black pepper (to taste)
    -1 tsp. liquid smoke
    -2 tsp. Lawry's garlic salt
    - sliced peperoncini's &/or juice to tase

Directions

Place all ingredients into large slow cooker. Cook on high for 6 hours (stirring occasionally if you are around) or until ham hocks come apart. Remove skin, bones, & visible fat from ham and discard. Serve hot. Great leftover.
Makes approx. ten 1 cup servings.
Note: Fat & calories may vary slightly as much of the ham hock is removed after cooking, leaving only the leaner bits of meat.

Number of Servings: 10

Recipe submitted by SparkPeople user SHOOLEYMCCUCKOO.

Rate This Recipe

Member Ratings For This Recipe


  • Incredible!
    2 of 2 people found this review helpful
    Spooned over cornbread with a side of greens and you have southern comfort food at its finest!!!! A+A+A+ - 8/15/09

    Was this review helpful?   yes  No

  • Very Good
    2 of 2 people found this review helpful
    Classic recipie, though I don't use the liquid smoke - 10/15/07

    Was this review helpful?   yes  No

  • Incredible!
    1 of 1 people found this review helpful
    Great Used a ham bone instead of ham hock. - 7/22/11

    Was this review helpful?   yes  No

  • Incredible!
    yum. - 1/5/18

    Was this review helpful?   yes  No


  • - 12/9/16

    Was this review helpful?   yes  No