Slow cooker pork roast

4.3 of 5 (6)
member ratings
Nutritional Info
  • Servings Per Recipe: 6
  • Amount Per Serving
  • Calories: 162.8
  • Total Fat: 3.5 g
  • Cholesterol: 83.3 mg
  • Sodium: 919.9 mg
  • Total Carbs: 6.1 g
  • Dietary Fiber: 0.5 g
  • Protein: 28.8 g

View full nutritional breakdown of Slow cooker pork roast calories by ingredient

Number of Servings: 6


    1 2-Lb Costco Sirloin Tip Pork Roast
    1 Envelope Lipton Onion Soup Mix
    1 Can Campbell's Healthy Request Cream of Chicken Soup
    1 tsp. Dried Thyme
    1 tsp. Dried Rosemary
    1/4 Tsp dried red pepper flakes
    1/2 tsp. ground black pepper
    2 cups water (My slow cooker runs extra hot, so I need this much water to prevent scorching. Use less for a normal slow cooker.)


Mix soups, spices, and water in slow cooker to blend, then add roast. Cook on low setting for 10 hours, until pork is cooked through and is falling apart.

Serves six, including pork and sauce (which is great over brown rice.)

Number of Servings: 6

Recipe submitted by SparkPeople user JENI-OH!.

Member Ratings For This Recipe

  • no profile photo

    Yum - 6/30/19

  • no profile photo

    Very Good
    I'm going to make this recipe tomorrow but I am going to use chicken broth instead of water because I think it will give a much richer, and I have NEVER made anything in my slow cooker that took more than 8 hours, so I think the 10 hour cooking time is a bit much. I will get back and let you know. - 5/3/19

  • no profile photo

    Delicious!! So soft you could cut it with a fork. I used cream of celery soup instead and gravy was fabulous. - 2/8/15

  • no profile photo

    Very Good
    Made yesterday and it was excellent. I agree that you need to cut back on the water. I wouldn't even add 1/2 cup next time. There will be a next time. - 3/20/11

    Reply from JENI-OH! (3/20/11)
    Thanks so much for the tip. I have edited the recipe to note that less water is best if your slow cooker doesn't run hot, which mine does.

  • no profile photo

    Very Good
    This was very good. The "gravy" was quite runny so we chose not to use it (also reduced the calories). Definitely a do over. - 1/24/11