Bean and Pork Chop Bake


4.2 of 5 (5)
member ratings
Nutritional Info
  • Servings Per Recipe: 4
  • Amount Per Serving
  • Calories: 418.5
  • Total Fat: 10.6 g
  • Cholesterol: 51.5 mg
  • Sodium: 1,435.2 mg
  • Total Carbs: 61.2 g
  • Dietary Fiber: 10.2 g
  • Protein: 27.4 g

View full nutritional breakdown of Bean and Pork Chop Bake calories by ingredient



Number of Servings: 4

Ingredients

    3 Pork Chops
    1 TBSP EVOO
    1 Apple, peeled and sliced thin
    1 small onion, chopped
    1 Can Bush's Baked Beans (16oz)
    1/4 tsp cinnamon
    1TBSP Maple Syrup
    1/4 tsp salt

Directions

In a Fry pan, brown Pork Chops on both sides in oil. Remove to a plate for a few minuets. In same pan brown onion and apple till tender. Stir in beans and 1/8 tsp cinnamon. Spoon it in a 11x 7" Pan. Top with Pork Chops and baked COVERED(with tin-foil) @ 350 for 40 Minuets. Then, Brush Pork Chops with maple Syrup, sprinkle with salt and 1/8 cinnamon. Bake UNCOVERED for 5-10 more min.

Number of Servings: 4

Recipe submitted by SparkPeople user VDORNBOS1.

Member Ratings For This Recipe


  •  no profile photo


    3 of 3 people found this review helpful
    EVOO is extra virgin olive oil - 3/19/09


  • no profile photo

    Good
    1 of 1 people found this review helpful
    Edited comment -
    CHASUK, this recipe was altered AFTER I left my comment, apparently to correct the error I pointed out. The caloric information on the original recipe was 757 calories, 22g fat, 61g carbs, 81g protein. Hardly the result of smaller pork chops. ;-)

    - 3/19/09


  • no profile photo

    Incredible!
    We really enjoyed this dish. Especially now during Maple Suger season (we're in Quebec & tapping our own trees!). Qualifies as comfort food! - 3/23/10


  • no profile photo

    Incredible!
    The apple and cinnamon really make this special. - 3/19/09


  • no profile photo


    MEMRYLAPS: three pounds of pork chops would weigh more than three pieces, not less, which means that it would contain more calories,not less. I suggest that the difference in caloric values came from VDORNBOS1 using smaller pork chops. - 3/19/09