Nutrition Facts
Servings Per Recipe: 4
Serving Size: 1 serving
Amount Per Serving
  • Calories 161.5
  • Total Fat 1.6 g
  • Saturated Fat 0.4 g
  • Polyunsaturated Fat 0.5 g
  • Monounsaturated Fat 0.2 g
  • Cholesterol 41.2 mg
  • Sodium 241.0 mg
  • Potassium 722.4 mg
  • Total Carbohydrate 18.2 g
  • Dietary Fiber 3.0 g
  • Sugars 0.6 g
  • Protein 18.4 g
  • Vitamin A 338.1 %
  • Vitamin B-12 4.5 %
  • Vitamin B-6 28.1 %
  • Vitamin C 33.9 %
  • Vitamin D 0.0 %
  • Vitamin E 0.5 %
  • Calcium 4.2 %
  • Copper 7.4 %
  • Folate 12.2 %
  • Iron 9.9 %
  • Magnesium 11.1 %
  • Manganese 8.6 %
  • Niacin 47.6 %
  • Pantothenic Acid 9.8 %
  • Phosphorus 21.2 %
  • Riboflavin 8.4 %
  • Selenium 19.9 %
  • Thiamin 8.6 %
  • Zinc 6.0 %
*Percent Daily Values are based on a 2,000 calorie diet. Your daily values may be higher or lower depending on your calorie needs.

Calories in Easy Slow Cooker Chicken Dinner

View the full Easy Slow Cooker Chicken Dinner Recipe & Instructions
Submitted by: SONNY912

Calories per Ingredient

Here are the foods from our food nutrition database that were used for the nutrition calculations of this recipe.

Calories per serving of Easy Slow Cooker Chicken Dinner

86 calories of Chicken Breast (cooked), no skin, roasted, (1 unit (yield from 1 lb ready-to-cook chicken))

37 calories of Baby Carrots, raw, (7.50 large)

35 calories of Red Potato, (50 grams)

5 calories of Soup, LIPTON, RECIPE SECRETS ONION, Mix, Dry, (0.25 serving)


Nutrition & Calorie Comments  

While this recipe is filling and extremely easy to make, I felt that it was lacking in flavor. I even substituted the water for a low sodium chicken broth. If I attempt to make this recipe again, I'll add in extra veggies and spices as suggested by others. Submitted by:
GENNABEAN
(8/10/17)
report inappropriate
LOVE IT! My new favorite meal. It's like a pot roast, but with chicken. I did use low sodium chicken broth instead of water. Submitted by:
JESSYMCCAULEY
(11/18/14)
report inappropriate
I usually do a makeover on the recipes I make, and sorry, if you make this as is is written, WAY to much sodium. In the recipe calculator, writer has 1 SERVING of the soup mix, but recipe calls for 16 servings (8 serv/envelope). Submitted by:
HWNHMMBRD
(2/24/14)
report inappropriate
i added two stalks of celery in. tried for green beans (2 cups add 15 calories per serving) but my crock pot was full. :( Submitted by:
RENNMAR
(1/22/13)
report inappropriate
Everyone loved it, very flavorful and less fatty than with beef. I added onnion at the begiining and then some broccoli to it in the last 20 minutes of cooking. Submitted by:
JRSEYGIRL
(5/3/12)
report inappropriate
The nutrition count on this is wrong. Calories are 381 and the sodium is 1867. Submitted by:
DR1939
(11/12/11)
report inappropriate
4 or 5 cups of water would be far too much. No wonder some people found it bland. I used 1 1/2 cup, and actually one would do. I added two onions, and some salt-free spike, since some people thought there wasn't enough flavor. It turned out very flavorful. Submitted by:
LAURANCE
(9/13/11)
report inappropriate
lack of saltiness from soup was a pleasant surprise! Submitted by:
WAHOORN96
(11/14/10)
report inappropriate
Definitely going to try this recipe. However, I will follow some of your advice and cut the water. The other change I will make will using low sodium onion soup mix. Submitted by:
COBOUCH53
(11/12/10)
report inappropriate
too much sodium, I use low sodium broth, Herbes de Provence
fresh or dried onions, fresh ground pepper and a tiny bit of sea salt. 		Submitted by:
JEANUT
(11/12/10)
report inappropriate
I don't use a crock pot so I cooked it on the stove. I create my own base with water, herbs and spices. Packaged dry soup is too high is sodium, so I never use it. Fast & easy, even done stovetop. Thank-you. Submitted by:
KMAKEY
(11/12/10)
report inappropriate
I make this a lot and my family loves it! My variations are mixed vegetables, low sodium chicken broth, and a can of diced tomatoes! I tried not using the dry soup and the flavor was lost. I shred the chicken after it is cooked and sometimes add brown rice, but not usually. Easiest soup ever! Submitted by:
DEDEBURT
(10/25/10)
report inappropriate
I remade this recipe using low sodium vegetable broth and fresh onions. Great! Submitted by:
RAGGEDY_ANN
(8/6/10)
report inappropriate
I made my own onion soup mix so that cuts the sodium and makes it healthier. Submitted by:
GAILLOSKI
(8/5/10)
report inappropriate
This sounds delicious, except that the amount of sodium in the soup mix is WAY too high, especially for my husband after a heart attack. No problem, though. I make my own special blend of herbs and spices for chicken recipes that if VERY low in sodium and VERY high in flavor! Submitted by:
SNARDEESNIFF
(8/5/10)
report inappropriate
I was a bit skeptical about the nutrition values after seeing that 2 pkg. of dry onion soup mix was used so I recalculated this recipe.
4 servings using 4 (4oz chicken breast)

Per serving -

Calories = 307.3
Total Fat = 2.2 grams
Sodium = 2,564.8 grams - WOW...not healthy for anyone

Submitted by:
TRISHZ
(8/5/10)
report inappropriate
turnips instead of potatoes...I use them in everything from pot roast to mashed...way fewer calories and great taste and texture Submitted by:
LAB4747
(8/5/10)
report inappropriate
Dry onion soup is sooooooooooo salty, is there an alternative for those of us with HBP? Submitted by:
KATHRYNLP
(8/5/10)
report inappropriate
I made something similar to this already and add fat free mushroom soup with extra garlic. I add cornstarch or masa flour to broth for thickening. Submitted by:
SWEESIN
(8/5/10)
report inappropriate
this is very easy but I omitted the soup mix(I don't need all the sodium)....added my own spices and real onion, celery, mushrroms, turnips, it was great for lunch the next day too Submitted by:
KITT52
(8/5/10)
report inappropriate
Easy but not as tasty as other recipes. Next time will try other recommendations of no-fat, low sodium chicken broth, some herbs and try some additional vegetables. Submitted by:
NEXT30YEARS
(5/10/10)
report inappropriate
Definitely have my doubts about this recipe. Calls for more liquid than a typical slowcooker recipe. Calories are surely too low. And - as I feared - 1 1/2 hours on high is not enough time. Still waiting for it to finish. No 8 hours of sleep tonight! Submitted by:
NNCY97
(3/2/10)
report inappropriate